Skip to content
  • Home
  • #Laws4U – Laws 4 Life
  • About
  • Disclaimer
  • Home

Recent Posts

  • UK Supreme Court: Appeal Permission Granted
  • SUPREME COURT DECISION
  • Contractual Limitation: High Court narrows “consequential loss”
  • Daughter cut out of will loses to animal Charities
  • Supreme Court: Malicious Claims Actionable – What do you think?

Recent Comments

J Paul Sykes on Conflict of Interest: Accounta…
Nathan Combes on Conflict of Interest: Accounta…
Directors & Shar… on WHEN DIRECTORS FALL OUT
Directors & Shar… on Service of a Claim Form on a…
Directors & Shar… on Are you a Shadow or de facto…

Archives

  • May 2019
  • March 2018
  • March 2017
  • January 2017
  • November 2016
  • June 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014

Categories

  • Directors & Shareholders
  • Disputed Wills & Trusts
  • Legal Comment
  • Legal Laughs
  • Litigation
  • Professional Negligence
  • Uncategorized
  • Unfair Prejudice

Recent Posts

  • UK Supreme Court: Appeal Permission Granted
  • SUPREME COURT DECISION
  • Contractual Limitation: High Court narrows “consequential loss”
  • Daughter cut out of will loses to animal Charities
  • Supreme Court: Malicious Claims Actionable – What do you think?

Recent Comments

J Paul Sykes on Conflict of Interest: Accounta…
Nathan Combes on Conflict of Interest: Accounta…
Directors & Shar… on WHEN DIRECTORS FALL OUT
Directors & Shar… on Service of a Claim Form on a…
Directors & Shar… on Are you a Shadow or de facto…

Archives

  • May 2019
  • March 2018
  • March 2017
  • January 2017
  • November 2016
  • June 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014

Categories

  • Directors & Shareholders
  • Disputed Wills & Trusts
  • Legal Comment
  • Legal Laughs
  • Litigation
  • Professional Negligence
  • Uncategorized
  • Unfair Prejudice

Meta

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.com

j paul sykes

Litigation & Dispute Resolution

Conditional fees

Supreme Court’s Decision on Costs Regime

what-is-justice-1

Long awaited judgment in Coventry v Lawrence declares costs regime did not infringe Human rights.

For my analysis see:

http://www.luptonfawcett.com/blog/new-omni-shambles-averted/

scales-145464_150pixaby

 

 

 

 

 

 

Posted on July 23, 2015July 23, 2015 by J Paul Sykes Posted in Legal Comment, Litigation, Uncategorized Tagged Conditional fees, costs regime, Human Rights, Supreme Court Leave a comment
Blog at WordPress.com.
Cancel

 
Loading Comments...
Comment
    ×
    Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
    To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy